From
The challenge of retelling Grimms' fairy tales by Philip Pullman. Obviously in promotion of his new book,
Fairy Tales from the Brothers Grimm: A New English Version. If I had time, I would agree and disagree with elements in the article, but I don't, so I won't. And I find Pullman personally pushes and pulls me at various times whenever he writes op/ed type stuff so it's hard not to let that color my opinions, either. But don't miss the comments to the article because there is some lively discussion and it's all food for thought.
Fed
Up so long and variously by
Our age's fancy narrative concoctions,
I yearned for the kind of unseasoned telling found
In legends, fairy tales, a tone licked clean
Over the centuries by mild old tongues,
Grandam to cub, serene, anonymous.
So my narrative
Wanted to be limpid, unfragmented;
My characters, conventional stock figures
Afflicted to a minimal degree
With personality and past experience –
A witch, a hermit, innocent young lovers,
The kinds of being we recall from Grimm,
Jung, Verdi, and the commedia dell'arte.
So writes the American poet James Merrill at the opening of "The Book of Ephraim", the first part of his extraordinary long poem The Changing Light at Sandover (1982). Discussing the way in which he hopes to tell a story of his own, he singles out two of the most important characteristics of the fairy tale, as he sees it: the "serene, anonymous" voice in which it's told, and the "conventional, stock figures" who inhabit it.
When Merrill mentions "Grimm", he needs to say no more: we all know what he means. For most western readers and writers in the past two hundred years, the Kinder- und Hausmärchen (Children's and Household Tales) of the Brothers Grimm has been the fountain and origin of the western fairy tale, the greatest collection, the most widely distributed in the largest number of languages, the home of all we feel to be unique in that kind of story.
As always, a much longer article. Click through to read the entire thing.
I find that while fairy tales are simple in prose, but amazingly difficult to understand in their nature. They are folk in nature, except for the ones that are written. They are dark and scary, except the ones that aren't. They are children's fare while simultaneously not being meant for them. They teach a lesson, but only the ones that are meant to. They defy every box people try to put them in.
ReplyDelete